Manufacturing Industry
Changes in manufacturing processes
From the 1970s on there were substantial changes in manufacturing
processes. This particular factory was not effected in the way that the car
manufacturers and others where. The smelting pouring and moulding processes
were not particularly suited to being done by robots. Developments in pressed
metals meant that some components were cheeped made by pressing rather than
pouring and there was a loss in production, some jobs were lost but not because
of ICT as such.
To the right is the interface of CAD software.
The main effected area was the machine shop where the advent of CAM had
a significant effect on employment and work processes. Gradually five sixths of
the work force were redundant as new machine milled ground and turned the
components more or less automatically. The remaining workforce was
substantially better skilled with computer programming rather than manual
skills. However the work was fair boring machine minding type tasks rather than
active work. Absenteeism on the workforce increase by 4 fold in the 20 years
from the 70s to the 90s. This could have been for a range of other social
reasons.
The drawing office was effected by CAD, however as many of the
components made were designed between the two world wars the effect was not as
great as it was in many drawing offices employees dropped by 80% but this was a
very gradual process, there wasn't a great deal of redundancy, people left and
were not replaced. In many drawing offices numbers were reduced to 5% of the
original. In our factory the number of grades of employees was reduced from 4
to 2. Those who remained had very different skills from the original workers
There was substantial retaining needed and some employees could not cope with
the change to the new methods of working.
To the left is a Multiple-Axis CNC Machining Centres for Parts and Tool
Manufacturing
A third change adversely effected the scientific employees the test of
samples of the metals was automated and many lost their jobs. But the numbers
involved here were small.
|