![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Evolution of information systems
¨
Centralised
processing systems ¨
Dispersed
systems ¨
Distributed
processing ¨
Local
area networks (LANs) ¨
Wide
area networks (WANs) ¨
Distributed
databases ¨
Public
networks 1. Central database
can be partitioned 2. Entire database
is duplicated at each remote site. In both cases, the two databases have to be
reconciled - usually by updating the central database each night 3. Central database
contains only an index A variation of this system is not to hold an index,
and to simply poll all remote databases until the required record is found. The
complete record is then transferred to the local computer that requests it. Distributed
databases
¨
reduce
the dependence on a single, central database. ¨
increase
responsiveness to local users’ and customers’ needs Limitations ¨
dependent
on powerful and reliable telecoms systems ¨
local
databases can sometimes depart from central data definitions and standards, ¨
security
can be compromised when distribution widens access to sensitive data. |
|||
|
©LEV |
|||