Fraud
Computers are responsible for managing money, stock and other valuable
resources. Employees working with the computer may spot weaknesses that allow
them to commit fraud. They could, for example, divert stock to a point where
they could collect and sell it. They could add items to customer accounts but
instruct the system to accept the correct amount while diverting the balance to
their own account. With less finesse they could simply instruct the computer to
pay money into a foreign bank in their name and then flee the country.
The scale of computer operations and their automatic nature makes some
frauds both possible and worthwhile. Instructing the computer to round bank
interest payments down instead of up will produce, at best 0.5p per customer.
Customers will not notice such a small amount missing from their interest
payment but the net gain for the fraudster could be 10000 on 2 million
accounts. This sum would be generated every time interest was calculated.
The type of person likely to commit a computer related fraud is likely
to be a trusted employee who has discovered a loophole in the system. Over the
centuries methods of auditing and checking have been developed to detect and
prevent fraud in paper-based systems. When computers were first introduced,
many of these preventative methods were not carried through into the new
electronic systems. Unscrupulous employees were therefore able to device
methods to defraud their employer.
Preventing such fraud involves a variety of methods which include:
- Ensuring that each transaction leaves an audit trail from start to
end. The audit trail will consist of both paper documentation and an audit log
compiled and maintained by the system. This allows an auditor to follow
transactions, ensuring that they have been properly dealt with at each stage
and that no unauthorised alterations have been made.
- Separating the various stages involved in processing a transaction so
that no single person is responsible for all of them. This makes it harder for
a single individual to corrupt the system.
- Restricting access to the system so that employees have only the type
of access (read/write/change) needed for the tasks that they are responsible
for.
- Install software to look for and report odd or peculiar
transactions.
|