BONDING IN BENZENE
The Kekulé structure for
benzene, C6H6
What is the Kekulé structure?
Kekulé was the first to suggest a
sensible structure for benzene.
The carbons are arranged in a hexagon, and he suggested alternating
double and single bonds between them. Each carbon atom has a hydrogen
attached to it.
This diagram is often simplified by leaving out
all the carbon and hydrogen atoms!
In diagrams of this sort, there is a carbon atom
at each corner. You
have to count the bonds leaving each carbon to work out how many
hydrogens there are attached to it. In this case, each carbon
has three bonds leaving
it. Because carbon
atoms form four bonds, that means you are a bond missing - and that
must be attached to a hydrogen atom.
Problems with the Kekulé
structure
Although the Kekulé structure was a
good attempt in its time, there are serious problems with it . . .
Problems with the chemistry
Because of the three double bonds, you might
expect benzene to have reactions like ethene - only more so! Ethene
undergoes addition reactions in which one
of the two bonds
joining the carbon atoms breaks, and the electrons are used to bond
with additional atoms. Benzene rarely does this. Instead, it
usually
undergoes substitution
reactions in which one of the hydrogen atoms is replaced by something
new.
Problems with the shape
Benzene is a planar molecule (all the atoms lie in
one plane), and
that would also be true of the Kekulé structure. The problem
is that
C-C single and double bonds are different lengths.
| C-C |
0.154 nm |
| C=C |
0.134 nm |
That would mean that the hexagon would be
irregular if it had the
Kekulé structure, with alternating shorter and longer sides.
In real
benzene all the bonds are exactly the same - intermediate in length
between C-C and C=C at 0.139 nm. Real benzene is a perfectly regular
hexagon.
Problems with the stability of
benzene
Real benzene is a lot more stable than the
Kekulé structure would
give it credit for. Every time you do a thermochemistry calculation
based on the Kekulé structure, you get an answer which is
wrong by
about 150 kJ mol-1. This is most easily shown
using enthalpy changes of hydrogenation. In order to do a fair comparison with benzene (a
ring structure) we're going to compare it with cyclohexene.
Cyclohexene, C6H10, is a
ring of six carbon atoms containing just one C=C.
1. When hydrogen is added to this, cyclohexane, C6H12,
is formed. The "CH" groups become CH2 and the
double bond is replaced by a single one. In the
cyclohexane case, for example, there is a carbon atom at each corner,
and enough hydrogens to make the total bonds on each carbon atom up to
four. In this case, then, each corner represents CH2. The hydrogenation
equation could be written:

The enthalpy change
during this reaction is -120 kJ mol-1. In other
words, when 1 mole of cyclohexene reacts, 120 kJ of heat energy is
evolved.
Where does this heat energy come from? When the
reaction happens,
bonds are broken (C=C and H-H) and this costs energy. Other bonds have
to be made, and this releases energy. Because the bonds made are stronger than those
broken, more energy
is released than was used to break the original bonds and so there is a
net evolution of heat energy.
2. If the ring had two double
bonds in it initially (cyclohexa-1,3-diene),
exactly twice as many bonds would have to be broken and exactly twice
as many made. In other words, you would expect the enthalpy change of
hydrogenation of cyclohexa-1,3-diene to be exactly twice that of
cyclohexene - that is, -240 kJ mol-1.

In fact, the enthalpy change is -232
kJ mol-1 - which isn't far
off what we are predicting.
3. Applying the same argument to the
Kekulé structure for benzene (what might be called cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene),
you would expect an enthalpy change of -360 kJ mol-1,
because there are exactly three times as many bonds being broken and
made as in the cyclohexene case.

In fact what you get is -208 kJ
mol-1 - not even within scope of the predicted value!
This is very much easier to see on an enthalpy
diagram. Notice that
in each case heat energy is released, and in each case the product is
the same (cyclohexane). That means that all the reactions "fall down"
to the same end point.

Heavy lines, solid arrows and bold numbers
represent real changes. Predicted changes are shown by dotted lines and
italics.
The most important point to notice is that real
benzene is much
lower down the diagram than the Kekulé form predicts. The
lower down a
substance is, the more energetically stable it is.
|